Weight loss can often feel like an impossible task, with many diets proving unsustainable in the long term. Despite your best efforts, you might frequently find yourself returning to your initial weight after shedding a few pounds. Enter the weight set-point theory—a concept tied to the body’s innate drive for homeostasis. This theory suggests that each individual has a predetermined range of weight or fat mass, known as the set point where compensatory physiological mechanisms work tirelessly to uphold this set point, resisting significant deviations from it. Understanding this theory could offer insights into the complexities of weight management and the challenges faced by those striving for lasting change.

Why Under-Eating Fails in the Battle Against the Set-Point

Based on the set-point theory, when your body doesn’t receive sufficient nutrients and energy from food, intricate biological mechanisms activate, initiating a primal response to conserve resources. This manifests as a slowdown in metabolism, heightened hunger, and a compelling urge to eat, commonly referred to as “starvation mode.” While calorie reduction may yield temporary weight loss, prolonged periods of low energy intake can lead to metabolic slowdown as the body strives to conserve energy.

The Minnesota Starvation Experiment stands as one of the pioneering inquiries into the consequences of inducing starvation mode. Initiated by Dr. Ancel Keys during World War II in 1944, the study aimed to illuminate the physiological and psychological tolls of famine, offering insights crucial for supporting malnourished soldiers and war victims. Thirty-two healthy men, devoid of any apparent physical or mental ailments, volunteered for the yearlong investigation. For the first six months, their daily calorie intake was restricted to 1500-1800 calories, plunging them into a state of semi-starvation while maintaining their high activity levels, resulting in a significant calorie deficit. After the starvation period, they were allowed unrestricted access to food. Despite shedding considerable weight during the first half of the experiment, their metabolic rates plummeted sharply. Upon resuming normal eating habits, they not only regained lost weight but predominantly accumulated fat due to their sluggish metabolisms. Beyond the physical repercussions, their mental well-being bore a heavy toll. Many developed obsessive thoughts about food, accompanied by feelings of guilt and shame. Mood swings became more frequent, and their fixation on food intensified, demonstrating the profound psychological impact of prolonged dietary restriction.

Louise Digby, a nutritional therapist and weight-loss specialist catering to women aged 35 to 55, told the Epoch Times that she advocates for a nuanced approach that emphasizes nourishment over deprivation and prioritizes gentle adjustments in both diet and exercise. She stresses that extreme measures like severe calorie restriction or punishing workout regimens often backfire, triggering a stress response in the body that undermines weight-loss efforts.

It has also been shown that under-eating can drive the hormone neuropeptide which can make you seek more carbohydrate-dense foods. Digby explains that when the body is deprived of essential nutrients, calories, or carbohydrates, it interprets this as a threat and can enter a state of heightened stress. In response, it conserves energy by reducing metabolic rate and other bodily functions, while simultaneously elevating stress hormone levels, notably cortisol. Elevated cortisol levels not only disrupt sex hormones but also impact insulin regulation, blood sugar levels, and weight management. Moreover, heightened cortisol levels prompt the body to mobilize glucose from muscles for immediate energy, ultimately leading to the accumulation of fat, particularly around the abdomen. This emphasis on the role of cortisol and stress in weight gain, particularly in the midlife stage, challenges conventional beliefs that attribute excess weight solely to overeating or lack of exercise. By adopting a more holistic approach that addresses both physical and emotional well-being, Digby advocates for sustainable weight-loss strategies that prioritize nourishment, stress management, and balanced exercise routines tailored to individual needs.

The Role of Hunger Hormones

Another factor to consider when the body detects that there is a lack of food is the interplay of hunger hormones. Ghrelin and leptin, key players in appetite regulation, dynamically adjust hunger signals in response to the body’s energy status. Ghrelin, often dubbed the “hunger hormone,” spikes to stimulate appetite when food is scarce, while leptin, released by fat cells, works to suppress appetite and increase satiety, particularly in times of ample fat stores. Together, these hormones finely tune hunger cues, orchestrating a delicate balance between nourishment and energy reserves based on the body’s physiological needs.

Dr. Andrew Jenkinson, weight-loss surgeon and author of “Why We Eat (Too Much),” sheds light on the mechanisms governing hunger and weight regulation. He explains in his book that hunger operates as a potent defence mechanism against weight loss, primarily orchestrated by the hypothalamus, a key region of the brain.

Leptin, a hormone released by fat cells, plays a pivotal role in this regulatory process. As fat mass increases, so does the presence of leptin in the bloodstream, serving as a signal to the hypothalamus about the body’s energy reserves. Elevated leptin levels prompt the hypothalamus to induce feelings of satiety, suppress appetite, and boost metabolic rate, all aimed at maintaining weight within a designated range, according to Jenkinson.

Conversely, when weight is lost, as occurs during dieting, periods of famine or illness, the reduction in fat mass leads to a decline in leptin levels. This triggers a response from the hypothalamus to counteract further energy loss by heightening appetite, diminishing satiety, and reducing resting metabolism. These adjustments effectively stall or halt further weight loss. Furthermore, Jenkinson underscores leptin’s role in thwarting weight loss efforts, highlighting how its fluctuations influence appetite regulation and metabolic activity. Consequently, when food becomes abundant again, weight gain ensues, driven by the body’s adaptive responses to fluctuating energy reserves.

Regrettably, Dr. Jenkinson highlights that the weight set point doesn’t always align with optimal health. In an ideal scenario, if this regulatory system functioned flawlessly, the prevalence of obesity wouldn’t pose such a significant challenge. However, the brain’s perception of what constitutes an advantageous weight can be influenced by environmental cues. For instance, if the brain anticipates potential scarcity of food, such as an impending famine, a prolonged winter, or the imposition of a low-calorie diet, it may signal the body to accumulate more fat reserves in preparation for perceived shortages or stressors. This adaptive response underscores the intricate interplay between biological mechanisms and environmental stimuli in shaping weight regulation.

Factors Overlooked in Weight Set-Point Model

Nichola Mostert, the founder and weight-loss dietitian at 4 Life Living Dieticians, told the Epoch Times that there is a lack of consensus within the scientific community regarding the existence and mechanisms of the weight set point. Mostert underscores that prevailing theories often overlook critical factors such as behavior, environment, and social influences, which play pivotal roles in weight regulation. Moreover, she points out a notable gap in the set-point theory’s explanatory power—it fails to elucidate why some individuals can sustain significant weight loss over the long term while others struggle to do so.

In essence, while the concept of a weight set point offers a valuable framework for understanding certain aspects of weight management, Mostert emphasizes that it represents just one facet of a multifaceted puzzle. Acknowledging the inherent complexity of our bodies, she asserts that effective weight management involves navigating a myriad of interconnected factors beyond a simplistic set-point model.

Digby also emphasizes that our propensity to gravitate toward a familiar weight isn’t solely dictated by our physiology; rather, it’s heavily influenced by our lifestyle choices and habits. Despite our efforts to enact change, we often find ourselves reverting to familiar patterns over time. To break this cycle, Digby advocates for a focus on habit formation when striving for long-term transformation. By conscientiously addressing and reshaping our habits, we can mitigate the tendency to return to our weight set point, thereby fostering lasting change.

How to Avoid Starvation Mode & Lose Weight for Good

Digby advocates for a holistic approach to achieving lasting weight change, emphasizing the need to modify our body’s internal mechanisms. This entails rebalancing hormone levels, mitigating inflammation, and restoring the equilibrium of gut bacteria. By addressing these fundamental factors, we can catalyze significant changes in our body’s functioning, enhancing its capacity to metabolize fat more efficiently. By improving overall bodily function, Digby suggests, we can overcome the barriers that often lead to stagnation at a particular weight, opening the door to sustained progress and transformation.

Ensure that you replenish your body’s energy reserves by consuming an adequate amount of food to reignite your metabolism. Rather than fixating solely on calorie counting, consider prioritizing nutrient-dense foods. This approach signals to your body that it’s adequately nourished and not under threat. Digby emphasizes the importance of including sufficient protein, carbohydrates, fiber, and a diverse array of nutrients in your diet, with an emphasis on whole foods. By prioritizing these nutritional elements, you can help ensure that your body receives the nourishment it needs to thrive.

Inadequate and poor-quality sleep can significantly stress the body, triggering inflammation and disrupting hormone balance, according to Digby. Insufficient sleep has the potential to derail progress, hindering weight-loss efforts. Mostert further underscores the detrimental impact of poor sleep on weight regulation, noting its association with weight gain and its potential to disrupt appetite and metabolism.

Jenkinson delves into the physiological mechanisms underlying this connection, highlighting the role of melatonin deficiency in exacerbating high cortisol levels and leptin resistance, ultimately raising the body’s weight set-point. Additionally, he elucidates how sleep deprivation leads to heightened levels of ghrelin, the appetite-stimulating hormone, exacerbating hunger and cravings for energy-dense foods. Thus, inadequate sleep not only results in leptin resistance and metabolic sluggishness but also intensifies appetite and cravings, posing significant challenges to weight management efforts.

Finally, fostering a positive mindset and practising self-compassion are crucial elements of sustainable weight management, as they can help individuals navigate setbacks and stay motivated on their path towards a healthier lifestyle, Mostert says.

The Epoch Times newspaper has published a version of this article.

Related Blog Posts

    Your Cart
    Your cart is emptyReturn to Shop